Official Nebraska Government Website

Search:

Call - Nebraska Court of Appeals

             WHEN PLACED UPON THE FINAL CALL, CASES WILL NOT BE CONTINUED EXCEPT ON MOTION AND FOR URGENT NECESSITY SHOWN. All cases placed on the Call of the Court of Appeals are subject to review for possible submission without oral argument pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-111(B)(1).  Unless a case is removed from the Call by order of the court on or before January 19, 2010, the case will proceed to oral argument as set out below.

            Unless otherwise indicated, the time allotted for the presentation of arguments is limited to 10 minutes per side.  This is a maximum allowance and counsel are not required to use the full time allotted.

            DURING ORAL ARGUMENT, WHEN THE TIMING LIGHT CHANGES FROM GREEN TO AMBER, THIS MEANS YOU ARE INTO YOUR REBUTTAL TIME, WHICH IS 2 MINUTES, UNLESS YOU HAVE RESERVED A GREATER OR LESSER TIME.  HOWEVER, WHATEVER REBUTTAL TIME YOU HAVE ASKED TO BE RESERVED, YOUR ONLY NOTIFICATION WILL BE THE AMBER LIGHT.  IF YOU CHOOSE TO CONTINUE ARGUING AFTER THE AMBER LIGHT, AND THE RED LIGHT APPEARS, YOU ARE COMPLETELY OUT OF TIME AND HAVE WAIVED REBUTTAL.

 

View Case Summaries

 

            Below will be found a list of cases which will be called for hearing in the Court of Appeals Courtroom, State Capitol Building, Lincoln, Nebraska, commencing January 26, 2010.

Panel I Judges:  Inbody, Chief Judge, Irwin, and Cassel, Judges.


TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2010, subject to call at 9:00 a.m.

A-09-0473

State v. Swiney

Hall

A-09-0453

State ex rel. Jacob v. Houston

Lancaster

A-09-0576

State v. Harmon

Lancaster

A-09-0760

Lawler Farm & Ranch Co. v. Bank of Paxton

Keith

A-04-0964

Larsen v. Sloan

Douglas

A-09-0781

Menkens v. Morse

Knox

A-09-0669

State v. Merheb

Lancaster


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010, subject to call at 9:00 a.m.

A-09-0437

State v. Vasquez-Arenivar

Hall

A-09-0833

In re Interest of Cedric T.

Lancaster

A-09-0616

In re Trust of Socha

Greeley

A-09-0663

Goodman v. Pecks

Lancaster

A-09-0639

Thieman v. Cedar Valley Feeding Company, Inc.

Boone

A-09-0711

In re Interest of Baby Girl P.

Hall

A-08-1323

Trogdon v. Trogdon

Douglas


            SIGN-IN:  Irrespective of the order in which listed, each case is subject to call for argument at 9:00 a.m. on the scheduled day.  Accordingly, attorneys and pro se parties appearing for argument must sign in at the Clerk’s Office before 8:45 a.m.

 

Panel II Judges:  Sievers, Carlson, and Moore, Judges.


TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 2010, subject to call at 1:00 p.m.

A-09-0536

State v. Curry

Cheyenne

A-09-0571

Moeller v. Moeller

Cuming

A-09-0655

In re Interest of Mariah R.

Lancaster

A-09-0356

Troia Family Limited Partnership v. Kool

Red Willow

A-09-0801

In re Interest of Rayna G.

Lancaster

A-09-0613

Jones obo Jones v. Brooks

Webster

A-09-0342

LaSalle Banking National Association v. Begley

Sarpy

A-09-0589

Stoler v. Otis Bed, Inc.

Douglas

A-09-0356

Troia Family Limited Partnership v. Kool

Red Willow


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2010, subject to call at 1:00 p.m.

A-09-0696

State v. Semrad

Lancaster

A-09-0891

In re Interest of Nadia S.

Douglas

A-09-0487

Prairie Fare, Inc. v. Voyager Holdings, LLC

Lancaster

A-09-0427

Hanson v. Smith

Douglas

A-09-0483

Cenovic v. Cenovic

Douglas

A-09-0734

Friedman v. Friedman

Howard

A-09-0821)
A-09-0822)

In re Interest of Tauteyana J.

Lancaster

A-09-0678

In re Estate of Stuthman

Platte

A-09-0861

Webb v. Airlite Plastics

WCC


            SIGN-IN:  Irrespective of the order in which listed, each case is subject to call for argument at 1:00 p.m. on the scheduled day.  Accordingly, attorneys and pro se parties appearing for argument must sign in at the Clerk’s Office before 12:45 p.m.

* * *    Special time limits previously established.

            RECORDS:  The transcript and bill of exceptions must be returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals no later than January 18, 2010, unless requested sooner by the Clerk.

Lincoln, January 4, 2010.

LANET S. ASMUSSEN

 

Back-up Docket

             In order to ensure that the Court hears a full calendar of argued cases during each argument session and is not left short of cases for argument by virtue of settlements or dismissals after the Call has been printed, the Court has established the following cases as “back-up cases.”  These cases are subject to being called for oral argument upon short notice in order to ensure a full argument calendar, but such cases will not be called after 4:00 p.m. on January 20, 2010.  If called, a case will be heard in accordance with its placement on the back-up docket which appears hereafter.  Counsel should attempt to maintain availability.  If not called, these cases may be placed on the March Proposed Call of the Court of Appeals. Please see the Proposed Calls for oral argument dates and conflict deadline.

JANUARY 26 or 27, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. or 1:00 p.m.

 

A-09-0821)
A-09-0822)

In re Interest of Tauteyana J.

Lancaster

A-09-0612

Thompson v. Thompson

Douglas

A-09-0790

In re Interest of A.H.

Cheyenne

A-09-0861

Webb v. Airlite Plastics

WCC

A-09-0696

State v. Semrad

Lancaster

A-09-0536

State v. Curry

Cheyenne

A-09-0781

Menkens v. Morse

Knox

A-09-0639

Thieman v. Cedar Valley Feeding Company, Inc.

Boone

 

 

Proposed Call

 

Papillion/Lincoln

             The following cases may be scheduled for argument before the Nebraska Court of Appeals at 9:00 a.m. on March 16, 17 or 18, 2010, in the County Boardroom, Room #1114, Sarpy County Administrative Building, Papillion, Nebraska or at 9:00 a.m. on March 16, 17 or 18, 2010, in the Court of Appeals Courtroom, State Capitol Building, Lincoln, Nebraska.  Check the Proposed Call for your case and mark your calendar.  Please notify the Clerk’s Office in writing by February 1, 2010, if you have a conflict on a date.  NOTE:  This deadline date will be strictly enforced.  If you can’t argue at any time during the session, ask the Court to continue the case by stipulation or by motion and proof of service.  You must show cause for the continuance.

            AFTER THE CASES HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED ON THE CALL, CASES WILL NOT BE CONTINUED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF URGENT NECESSITY.

Gen. No.

County


CRIMINAL CASES

A-09-0223

State v. Tamayo                (MFR)

Douglas

A-09-0648

State v. Martin

Lancaster

A-09-0983

In re Interest of Deng M.

 Lancaster

A-09-0769

State v. Poole

Douglas

A-09-0685

State v. Johnson

Douglas

A-09-0966

In re Interest of Jorge O.

 Lancaster

A-09-0720

State v. Rea

Scotts Bluff

 

ADVANCED CIVIL CASES (all will be heard unless otherwise ordered)

 

A-09-0801

In re Interest of Rayna G.

Lancaster

A-09-0702

In re Interest of Corey P.

 Douglas

A-09-0710

In re Interest of Dylan S.

 Douglas

A-09-0734

Friedman v. Friedman

Howard

A-09-0612

Thompson v. Thompson

Douglas

A-09-0790

In re Interest of A.H.

Cheyenne

A-09-0778

In re Interest of Sherri L.

 Douglas

A-09-0987

In re Interest of Jaydah G.

 Douglas

A-09-0993)
A-09-0994)

In re Interest of Ray'Cine L.
In re Interest of Dejan L.

 Douglas

A-09-1013

In re Interest of Desiree F.

 Douglas

A-09-1031

In re Interest of Emma J.

Lancaster

A-09-1040

In re Interest of Natasia C.

Hall

A-09-1057

In re Interest of Bianca H.

 Lancaster

A-09-1058

In re Interest of Baylee C.

 Lancaster

A-09-0848

In re Interest of Yiech Y.

 Douglas

A-09-0953

In re Interest of Carrdale H.

 Douglas

A-09-1060

In re Interest of Justice H.

 Lancaster

A-09-1080

In re Interest of Americal T.

 Douglas

A-09-0869

Houser v. Houser

Phelps

A-09-0622

Lewton v. Lewton

Sarpy

A-09-0803

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

Box Butte

A-09-0741

Harrington v. Harrington

Lancaster

A-09-0884

Holmes v. Chief Industries, Inc.

WCC

A-09-0725

Taylor v. Taylor

Sarpy

A-09-0665

Whisenhunt v. Whisenhunt

Lincoln

A-09-0813

State obo Newill v. Hosch

Dodge

A-09-0928

Phillips v. Phillips

Seward

A-09-1097

Longbine v. Lenco Inc.

WCC

A-09-0916

McMillan v. Wanzek Construction

WCC


NON-ADVANCED CIVIL CASES

 

A-09-0430

Thompson v. Alegent Health Immanuel Medical Center

Douglas

A-09-0672

Dankof v. Shiffermiller

Douglas

A-09-0646

Meyer v. Meyer

Nuckolls

A-09-0772

KAK, Inc. v. Schultz

Chase

A-09-0674

Bell v. Bell

Douglas

A-09-0788

Whittington v. Legent Clearing LLC

Douglas

A-09-0532

Schuette v. Schuette

Douglas

A-09-0903

State v. Valadez

Douglas

A-09-0687

Tolbert v. Omaha Housing Authority

Douglas

A-09-0770

In re Estate of Everhart

Douglas

A-09-0508

Pflug Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Pratt

Douglas

A-09-0611

Thunder Bay, Inc. v. Kawa

Douglas

A-09-0800

Watkins Concrete Block Co., Inc. v. Pacha

Douglas

A-09-0817

Villas of Southwind Townhome Association v. Southwind Homeowners Assn.

 

A-09-0814

Norby v. The Farnam Bank

Dawson

A-09-0704

Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Auto Buyers Limited

Douglas

A-09-0828

Arent v. Kelley

Lincoln

A-09-0838

Glass Lake, L.L.C. v. Hofer

Douglas

A-09-0531

Meadows v. Meadows

Buffalo

A-09-0630

Penner v. Penner

Hamilton

A-09-0871

Contreras v. Contreras

Hall

A-09-0496

Adams v. Adams

Otoe

A-09-0715

Courtney, LLC v. Reidmann

Sarpy

A-09-0780

State ex rel. Motsinger v. City of North Platte

Lincoln

A-09-0876

Perkins Delaware, LLC v. AWG Acquisition, LLC

Lancaster

A-09-0647

Sherman v. Sherman

Douglas

A-09-0726

In re Estate of Swanson

Scotts Bluff

A-09-0882

State ex rel. Linder v. Remmen

Saunders

A-09-0706

Manary v. Manary

Lincoln

A-09-0859

Jones v. Jones

Douglas

A-09-0943

Ellsworth v. Wilson

Douglas

A-09-0957

Ladd v. Lancaster County

Lancaster

A-09-0671

In re Family Trust of Akerlund

Douglas

A-09-0923

Fox v. Whitbeck

Douglas

A-09-0507

Hansen v. Wells Fargo, National Association

Douglas

A-09-0690

Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission v. Prokop

Lancaster

A-09-0729

Samson Construction Corp. v. Double D Excavating, Inc.

Douglas

 


If auxiliary aids or reasonable accommodations are needed for attendance at this hearing, please call the State Court Administrator's Office, (402) 471-3730, or for people with hearing impairments, please call the Nebraska Relay System, (800) 833-7352 TDD or (800) 833-0920 Voice.  Advance notice of seven days is needed when requesting an interpreter.

 

 

NOTICE

1.             Security.  When oral arguments are scheduled, admittance to the courtrooms of the Nebraska Supreme Court and Nebraska Court of Appeals is permitted only upon compliance with security requirements.  Before entering the courtrooms you will be required to walk through a metal detecting device.  Personal items, such as brief cases and purses, will be inspected by security personnel on duty.  Therefore, it would be helpful not to bring unnecessary materials to oral arguments. 

2.             Entering and exiting the courtroom.  Entering and exiting the courtroom is limited to the following time periods:

a.             before and after the court session.
b.             when a recess is taken by the court.
c.             between cases when attorneys are changing places.

3.             Restrictions. 
a.             Under no circumstances are food or drinks to be taken into the courtroom.  Hats and caps shall be removed.
b.             Except for assigned oral arguments, silence shall be maintained at all times during the court session.
c.             No photographs or recordings of court proceedings are allowed except as provided by Supreme Court Rule 17.
All cellular telephones and pagers shall be turned off.

4.             Lawyer's room.  The lawyer's room is located near the entrance of the courtrooms.  Security personnel will be happy to assist you in locating the room. 

5.             Display equipment.  A document stand camera and 50" plasma TV are now available in the courtroom for use in displaying exhibits or other documents during oral argument.  If you wish to utilize this equipment, please advise the bailiff prior to the start of the court session.  Instructions regarding the use of this equipment are available on our web site at www.supremecourt.ne.gov/appellate-court/av-instructional-sheet.pdf.  If you require additional information, please contact the Clerk's Office at 2413 State Capitol, 402-471-3731.

6.             Restrooms.  A restroom is located outside the lawyer's room.  A women's restroom is located at the end of the hallway to the west of the courtrooms.  A men's restroom is located down the west hallway and around the corner.

7.             Nebraska Supreme Court Policy for Audio Files Available over the internet.
a.     Notice to Attorneys:
Beginning September 1, 2008, the Nebraska Supreme Court and Court of Appeals will make digital audio files of appellate court proceedings available to the public over the Internet through the Judicial Branch Web site, www.supremecourt.ne.gov. Audio files of all appellate court proceedings held in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals court rooms will be uploaded to the Web site, unless otherwise specified by the Court.
                               
b.     Limiting Personal Information:
If otherwise confidential information is stated on the record in open court, it will become publicly available through the audio files of the Court. Since counsel and the parties are solely responsible for guaranteeing that confidential information be protected, the better practice is to avoid stating confidential or sensitive information during the audio recording of oral argument. Also, counsel and the parties are advised that audio files cannot be edited before they are uploaded to the Web site.
If confidential information is divulged during oral argument, counsel or the parties may move the Court to seal, restrict, or otherwise prohibit placement of the audio file on the Web site.
                                                          
c.     Privacy Rules:
Nebraska court rules protect certain personal and financial information from public disclosure at the trial court level. See Neb. Ct. R. § 6-1521 and Neb. Ct. R. § 6-1464.  Both rules are available in the “Chapter 6 Trial Courts” section of www.supremecourt.ne.gov under Uniform District Court Rules of Practice and Procedure and County Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.  If such protected information is divulged during oral argument before the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals, it will become available to the public through the placing of audio files on the Internet.

 


This file last modified Tuesday February 09, 2010 10:13:25