Home >> Cip Caselaw >> motion
 
 

motion

Filed on
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
SUMMARY: Termination of the father’s parental rights was improper because while he violated his parole and was returned to prison, the violation was only due to failing to visit his parole officer, and he had regular visits with the children prior to re-incarceration and had supported the children...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
SUMMARY: In adjudication cases, the proof required for active efforts under ICWA is by a preponderance of the evidence. Active efforts were provided in this case; however, removal of the children was improper because there was not evidence of serious emotional damage as required under ICWA. A court...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was proper where the child had multiple injuries over several years, where he was diagnosed with psycho-social dwarfism, where he was severely delayed in multiple areas but made quick improvements after being placed in foster care and where the parents failed...Read more
Filed on
Monday, April 28, 2014
SUMMARY: Adjudication and termination of the father’s parental rights was proper where the child was in out-of-home care for more than two years prior to the motion to terminate parental rights and the father was aware that the child was removed from the home but had only sporadic contact with the...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
SUMMARY: A court’s denial to reinstate visitation when the TPR was set for four months later is temporary and not final and appealable. In November 2010, Nery was removed from the family home pursuant to N.R.S. 43-247(3)(a). On December 8, 2010, a motion to terminate parental rights was filed as to...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
SUMMARY: The State’s 3a petition and motion for temporary custody should have been dismissed for failure to set forth allegations under ICWA because the State knew or should have known that ICWA applied. Avery, age 13, and Izabel, age 10, are the children of Katherine. On August 14, 2013, the State...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
SUMMARY: The parents’ behaviors, which included failure to take feeding instructions seriously, to have adequate formula and to comply with the feeding schedule, created a definite risk of harm that the baby would not be properly fed as medically required, warranting adjudication. It is not...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
SUMMARY: A person who held out to be the child’s biological father for 15 years and had the child placed with him as a potential long-term placement has a sufficient interest for intervention. Filing the petition to intervene after the adjudication hearing began was not untimely. Placement of the...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was improper because the tribe was not initially given proper notice of the termination proceedings as required under ICWA, only notice of the adjudication proceedings, nor was it provided with notice of the amended pleadings at least 10 days prior to trial...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
SUMMARY: Where proper rights advisements are not made at adjudication, the termination petition is treated as those filed under N.R.S. 43-292(2) without prior juvenile court involvement, requiring rights advisements at the termination stage. In this case, termination was improper because no rights...Read more

Pages

 
Subscribe to RSS - motion