Ross, Schroeder & George v. Artz

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Ross, Schroeder & George v. Artz

Case Number
A-14-1065
Call Date
November 17, 2015
Case Time
1:00 PM
Case Summary

A-14-1065, Ross, Schroeder & George, LLC, a limited liability company v. Lynn Artz and Dee Artz (Appellants)

District Court for Buffalo County, District Judge John P. Icenogle

Attorney for Appellants: Jeffrey P. Ensz (Lieske Law Firm)

Attorneys for Appellee: Kent A. Schroeder, William J. Ross, & Kenneth F. George (Ross Schroeder Law Firm)

Civil Action: Attorney fee collection

Action taken by the Trial Court: The law firm brought an action in county court, seeking to collect attorney fees for services provided by one of its attorneys. The county court found that an attorney-client relationship existed and entered judgment in favor of the firm. The Artzes appealed to the district court, which affirmed the judgment of the county court.

Assignments of Error on Appeal: Did the district court err in affirming the county court's finding that an attorney-client relationship existed between the Artzes and the attorney and its entry of judgment in favor of the law firm.

Case Location
Kearney
Panel Text
Moore, Chief Judge, Irwin, and Inbody, Judges