Strode v. City of Ashland, Nebraska

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Strode v. City of Ashland, Nebraska

Case Number
S-15-0956
Call Date
August 31, 2016
Court Number
Saunders
Case Summary

S-15-0956 Randy Strode and Helen Strode (Appellants) v. City of Ashland, Nebraska and Saunders County, Nebraska

Saunders County District Court, Hon. Mary C. Gilbride

Attorneys: Terry K. Barber, for appellants. Mark A. Fahleson and Sheila A. Bentzen (Rembolt Ludtke), for appellee City of Ashland. Duke Drouillard, for appellee Saunders County.

Civil: Inverse condemnation

Proceedings Below: Court dismissed or entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs' claims.

Issues: 1. The Trial Court Erred In Granting The City's Motion To Dismiss In Favor Of The City, And As To A portion Of The Claims Of Randy Strode, And In Particular, In Determining Those

Claims Were Precluded By Earlier Litigation. II. The District Court Erred In Granting Appellee City Of Ashland Summary Judgment, And In Ruling that No Issues Of Fact Were Raised. III. The District Court Erred In Granting Appellee Saunders County Summary Judgment, and In Ruling That No Issues Of Fact Were Raised. IV. The Trial Court Erred In Determining That The Regulatory Takings Claims Were Barred By The Statute Of Limitations. V. The Trial Court Erred In Determining That The Appellees' Regulation Of The Bridge Structure Alleged By The Appellants, Was Not A Regulatory Taking.